Legal Opinion

Szwed v. Bruno

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided December 28, 1939No. 15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dannehower, J.,

These cross-actions in trespass arose from the collision of an International truck, owned by Theodore Szwed, and a Buiek automobile, owned by Guiseppe Bruno. Each owner sought to recover from the other in a separate action the costs of repairs to his respective vehicle. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Szwed against Bruno in the sum of $464.84, and did not permit Bruno to recover in the case in which he was plaintiff. Bruno has filed a motion for a new trial, alleging the usual reasons, and also that the trial judge erred in admitting certain evidence over objection. It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. NoakesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Gaupin v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Yeager v. Winton Motor Carriage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Hart v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Siglin Et Ux. v. HaigesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Emanuel v. KetnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API