Legal Opinion

Ospina v. Security National Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 30, 1999No. 98-2310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In the underlying case, the trial court properly entered final summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Security National Insurance Company, as a matter of law. The law is well-settled that an insurance broker is generally the agent of the insured. Almerico v. RLI Ins. Co., 716 So.2d 774 (Fla.1998). Further, in the instant case, there was no record evidence that the insurance company took any action to lead the insured to believe that the insurance broker had actual or apparent authority as an agent of the carrier. Ruiz v. Fortune Ins. Co., 677 So.2d 1336, 1338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); T & R…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Almerico v. RLI Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. T & R Store Fixtures v. Travelers Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Ruiz v. Fortune Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huml v. CollinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Guarente-Desantolo v. JOHN ALDEN LIFE INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API