People v. Phiefer
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.
Appellant, convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Penal Law, § 265.01), argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence presented by the People was legally insufficient to establish his guilt.
The record discloses that the police received a complaint from one William Morrison that appellant had threatened to shoot him. Responding to this complaint, three officers proceeded to appellant’s residence. After identifying themselves as police officers to appellant, the officers were permitted to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. ReismanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. CerulloNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. PearsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. QuagliataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.