American Steel & Wire Co. v. Coover
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Qouri, Muskogee Qounty; Malcolm E. Bosser, Judge. Action by the American Steel & Wire Company against Carl E. Coover and O. E. Coover. Judgment for defendants, and pontiff brings error.
Read the full summary
Error from District Qouri, Muskogee Qounty; Malcolm E. Bosser, Judge. Action by the American Steel & Wire Company against Carl E. Coover and O. E. Coover. Judgment for defendants, and pontiff brings error. This is an action brought by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against defendants in error, Carl E. Coover and O. E. Coover, doing business under the firm name and style of Coover Hardware Company, to recover on a promissory note for the- sum of $1,082 and interest, executed on the 31st day of January, 1907, and signed by Coover Hardware Company. Ancillary to the main action, plaintiff…
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The question which we are asked to determine by this proceeding requires a consideration of all the evidence, and defendants object to any consideration thereof, upon the ground that the ease-made does not contain an averment by way of recital that it contains all the evidence. That, in order to authorize this court to review any alleged error which requires an examinaton of all the evidence, the case-made must contain an averment by way of a recital to the effect that it contains all the evidence, has been frequently held (Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co., 23…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Amsinck v. BeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- In re BertenshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Wagner v. Sattley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Dickey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Foot, Schulze & Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915