Legal Opinion

Goldsmiths & Silversmiths Co. v. Haas

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 15, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order granting the judgment-creditor’s motion to punish the judgment-debtor for contempt.for failing to appear for examination in supplementary proceedings, and fining her in the sum of $250, to be applied in paymént of the judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

The order appealed from contains no recital to the effect that the offense charged “ was calculated to, or actually did, defeat, impair, impede or prejudice the rights or remedies ” of the judgment-creditor. The absence of a recital to this effect is fatal to the order. Obermeyer v. Adisky, 123 App. Div. 272, 274; Guerrier v. Coleman, 135 id. 46.

I find nothing in the amendment of section 767 of the Code (Laws of 1911, chap. 368), “ Definition and form of an order,” to affect this determination. The mere authorization of what has come to be' known as a “ short form order ” does not excuse the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Springs v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Ross v. La CagninaNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. In re the Estate of HustedNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
  4. Kreiser v. KitaokaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  5. Obermeyer & Liebman v. AdiskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amendola v. ZemaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  2. Starr v. MorangeNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API