Harrington v. Stone
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Brown District Court. Replevin, by Harrington against Stone. Judgment for defendant, at the May term, 1886. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Simpson, C.:
This is an action of replevin, brought by Harrington against Stone, who was a constable, and had possession of three hundred and twenty-eight bushels of corn, which Harrington claimed to be his property. One Herman was the owner of the corn, and had cribbed it on the farm of Beatty. Harrington, who was a buyer and shipper of corn at Baker, in Brown county, claimed to have bought this corn from Herman on or about the 19th day of December, 1884. As evidence of his purchase he introduced the following written instrument: “ This certifies that I have sold this day to E.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- National Bank of Guthrie v. EarlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- North & South Lumber Co. v. HegwerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
- Sickinger v. State ex rel. HutchinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891