Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sandhu v. Sandhu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1983Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeinstein, J.

In my view, the evidence adduced in support of plaintiff husband’s application was insufficient to have warranted the entry of a divorce judgment in his favor. Notwithstanding the established principle that an appellate court should not substitute its views for those of the Trial Justice who saw and heard the litigants (Cataudella v Cataudella, 74 AD2d 893), the court in this instance failed to accord sufficient weight to the consequences which the divorce judgment would have upon defendant wife. Due to her own misconduct, she would be deprived of her right to support (Domestic Relations Law,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hessen v. HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Bulger v. BulgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Cataudella v. CataudellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Passantino v. PassantinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Bunce v. BunceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API