Legal Opinion

Lemunier v. McCearly

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1885No. 9395PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Ninth District Court for the Parish of Concordia. Young, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

On Motion to Dismiss.

Todd, J.

This motion is on the ground that the appeal is taken by Mrs. McCearly alone without, the authorization of her husband in the court.

Both husband and wife were joined in the suit, and jointly answered in the lower court. The. wife, has appealed.

*134In the case of Hill & Co., vs. Trippelt and wife, 10 Ann., 554, exactly similar in the respects mentioned to the present one, it was held, (quoting): “ That the defendants having been both joined in this suit by plaintiffs and appellees, and having both appeared and defended the same,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bergeron v. BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Jacquet v. DisimoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Whitbeck v. WhitbeckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. Smith v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Polanco v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API