Succession of Swanson

A rehearing was granted in this cause, and the case was remanded “for further evidence and trial, especially on the point of what was the state or condition of the will at the time of its presentation for probate — whether any fragment now missing was then present.” See 131 La. 53, 58 South. 1030. The cause has been tried anew, and from an adverse judgment Mrs. Melanie Levy has again appealed.

The judge a quo in his reasons for judgment says:

“Two witnesses for legatee testify that an additional piece or ‘sliver’ of paper was in the will when the probate was made, and that it is now missing.…