Fleming Et Ux. v. Klein Et Ux.

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This action of ejectment turns on the construction of plaintiffs’ title-papers. Defendants, who are appellants, contend that by the application of the familiar rule that courses and- distances in a deed yield to boundaries located on the ground, they were entitled to binding instructions in their favor. Plaintiffs contend that their evidence identifies on the ground the disputed boundary prescribed as a monument or call in the deeds and justifies their verdict

The land in dispute is in Cambria Township, Cambria County, several miles from -Ebensburg. It is a small five-sided…