Legal Opinion

Vastola v. Connecticut Protective System, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 15, 1946PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.

The defendant had installed a burglar alarm system in the plaintiff’s restaurant premises. During the early morning hours of May 23, 1944, after the restaurant had been securely locked and the alarm set, the premises were burglarized and the sum of $406.81 in cash was taken therefrom. Entrance was effected through a skylight which had been wired by the defendant as part of the system installed by it. Cleats or slats to which cross wires were attached were loosened and removed from the side of the well, so that a space large enough to permit entry was effected without breaking or touching the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Bown v. Waterbury Battery Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Demunda v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Genishevsky v. FishboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Karen Jutzi-Johnson, as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Johnson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Nicholas v. Miami Burglar Alarm Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Central Alarm of Tucson v. GanemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API