Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Parham v. Municipal Court, City of Sioux Falls
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1972No. File 10982Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBiegelmeier, Judge
I
With reference to the propriety of the issuance of a writ of prohibition by the circuit court it appears to me Judge Burns was correct in denying it. SDCL 16-6-15, the statute that gives power to circuit courts, provides:
*540"The circuit court has the power to issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, certiorari, and all other writs necessary to carry into effect its judgments, decrees, and orders (none is here involved), and to give to it a general control over inferior courts, officers, boards, tribunals, corporations, and persons." (emphasis supplied)
Appeals from municipal courts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.