Legal Opinion

Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. Lorentzen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1897No. 810PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States -for the District of Colorado. '

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit to recover damages for injuries sustained at a railroad crossing by Sirs. Anna Marie Lorentzen, the defendant in error, who was the plaintiff below. Mrs. Lorentzen was riding in a public conveyance, termed a “hack,” which was in charge of a driver, from the station of the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company, in Palmer Lake, Colo., to the station of the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad Company, in the same town or village. The two stations were some distance apart, and, on the route taken, it was necessary to drive across the track of the Denver & Rio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Indianapolis v. GastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Taylor-Craig Corp. v. HageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  4. United States Mut. Acc. Ass'n v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ora Greene Hudson, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Hudson, Deceased v. David Lazarus, Samuel Juster and Calvin JusterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  3. Roth v. ChatlosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Anderson v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. City of Englewood v. BryantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API