Legal Opinion
Serrano v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 30, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered September 14, 1988, which denied the motion of defendant-appellant for summary judgment, is unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of granting defendant-appellant the New York City Transit Authority partial summary judgment on the issue of the liability, insofar as to find, based upon the record before this court, that *298the New York City Transit Authority police did not have a duty to prevent plaintiffs decedent from boarding a subway train operated by defendant-appellant, and, except as thus…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Weiner v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. v. Isbrandtsen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Kircher v. City of JamestownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Merino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Figueroa v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Butler v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Walsh v. Town of CheektowagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997