Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boling v. Stegemann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 2007Published

1Dissent

Gorski, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent because, in my view, Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs motion seeking to set aside the jury verdict in favor of Philip M. Stegemann, M.D. and the County of Erie (defendants) as against the weight *1363of the evidence. As the court properly determined, the evidence so preponderates in plaintiff’s favor that the jury verdict in favor of defendants could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Higgins v Armored Motor Serv. of Am., Inc., 13 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2004]; Grant-White v Hornbarger, 12 AD3d 1066, 1067-1068…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. American Linen Supply Co. v. M.W.S. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Thomas v. New York University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Higgins v. Armored Motor Service of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Augustine v. DandreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API