Burke v. . Holtzmann
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 21, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff’s intestate through the refusal of the defendant, as commissioner of public works of the city of Schenectady, to allow such intestate, as a veteran of the Civil…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 21, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff’s intestate through the refusal of the defendant, as commissioner of public works of the city of Schenectady, to allow such intestate, as a veteran of the Civil War, a preference in appointment as laborer in such department of public works.
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Olí, J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
2Cited by7 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Friedman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1967
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Friedman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.