Legal Opinion

In re Calim

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998No. 98-51PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Applicant’s current application for admission to the bar is disapproved. Applicant is permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio by submitting a new application that contains complete, up-to-date information on all matters raised by the local admissions committee as well as any new matter that may have arisen after the hearing.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PanepintoOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re Application of CalimOhio Supreme Court · 1998