Legal Opinion
Zapf v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX CTY.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 3, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 N.J. Super. 426 (1965)
209 A.2d 660
HERTHA ZAPF, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 12, 1965.
Decided May 3, 1965.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, SULLIVAN and LABRECQUE.
Mr. C. Judson Hamlin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pincus, Shamy & Sheehan, attorneys).
Mr. Robert T. Quackenboss argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Burton, Seidman & Burton, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.A.D.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schwartz v. Borough of StocktonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- City of Kingsport v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
- Bailey v. City of KnoxvilleDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
- Thompson v. BD. OF EDUCATION, CITY OF MILLVILLESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Tripus v. PetersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manukas v. the American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Heffner v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Hughes v. County of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Kock v. Government of The Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Kock v. Government of Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984