Legal Opinion

Heinmuller v. Heinmuller

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 5, 1970No. [No. 295, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The parties to these two appeals were married in Baltimore, Maryland in 1936. Three sons were born of the marriage, all of whom are now over twenty-one. Marital discord arose some time after the family moved to a home in Baltimore County and the appellant, Carl Heinmuller, Jr., left that home in July 1964. Shortly thereafter the parties signed a separation agreement providing for custody and visitation rights concerning a minor child, support for the wife and child, division of personal property and of course, their separation. In addition there was an arrangement by which each would pay his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Lopez v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Foote v. FooteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Bushman v. BushmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Horsey v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Brodsky v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Goldberg v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Eckstein v. EcksteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API