Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Whiteco Metrocom v. State Highway & Transportation Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1985No. WD 36073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Presiding Judge.

Appellant owns an outdoor advertising sign located in Marion County on Route 36. In March, 1978, the Commission notified appellant to remove the sign because it was in violation of the location provisions contained in §§ 226.520 and 226.540, RSMo. 1969. Appellant obtained review of the removal order and appeals the decision by the circuit court of Cole County affirming the original commission decision. Affirmed.

The facts of the case were stipulated. The sign was erected May 30, 1968. It is therefore a pre-existing non-conforming sign entitled to a permit if it was in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Osage Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Superior Outdoor Advertising Co. v. State Highway Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Independent Stave Co. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State ex rel. White Advertising International v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osage Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Overland Outdoor Advertising Co. v. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Williamsburg Truck Plaza v. MuriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API