Legal Opinion

Grice v. Haskins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Sales. Contracts. Debtor and Creditor. Vendor and Purchaser. Title Jens. Registration. Record. Equitable Pleadings. Before R. M. Hodge, Esq., Judge pro Jiao vice. Pulaski Superior Court. May Term, 1884. . Reported in the decision

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

One Lovett purchased of Roberts & Gurr a mule named “ Babe,” at the price of $194, and paid them in cash one *702hundred dollars of this amount, giving them his note for $94, by the terms of which the title to the mule was to remain in Roberts & Gurr until it was fully paid for. At the same time, Lovett gave Roberts & Gurr a mortgage upon another mule named “Mollie,” as a further security for the payment of the note. The note and mortgage were both written on the same sheet of paper; both were duly attested by E. C. Smith, a notary public of Pulaski county; both bore the same date,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alston v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  2. Rawson v. CoffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vicars v. Atlantic Discount Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  2. Massengale v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API