Legal Opinion

Grant v. Clinkscales

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 3, 1957No. 17246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This is an action to recover actual and punitive damages for the alleged unlawful seizure and conversion by appellant of a television set. The trial resulted in a verdict for respondent for $500.00 actual damages and $1,000.00 punitive damages. Most of the exceptions relate to the admission of tes timony and can better be understood after a review of the facts and issues raised by the pleadings.

The allegations of the complaint may be summarized as follows:

Appellant is engaged in business at Pickens, South Carolina, under the name of Western Auto Associate Store. On March 26,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. Richardson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Marthers v. HurstSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Parker v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Black River Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Simon v. FlowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Ehlke v. NEMEC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API