Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Conn v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided September 30, 2002No. 01-8001Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteinberg, Judge

I agree with the majority that it is proper for the Court to accept the respondent’s resignation from the Bar of this Court and that we possess the authority to allow him to resign while under disciplinary investigation. However, I cannot join in the per curiam order because I believe that it is deficient (1) in failing to address the procedural issue of whether certain matters should first be submitted to the Committee on Admission and Practice (Committee), rather than the Court; (2) in its narrow view of “protection of the public”, as it relates to notification; and (3) in failing to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Kentucky Bar Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Head v. Kentucky Bar Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  3. O'Bryan v. Kentucky Bar Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API