Legal Opinion
Kildsig v. Warrick County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court
Decided October 8, 2013No. 82T10-1101-TA-2PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWentworth, J.
This case concerns the Indiana Board of Tax Review's determination that the bur*765den-shifting rule contained in Indiana Code § 6-1.1-15-1(p) did not apply to its proceedings and that a portion of Douglas G. Kildsig's land was properly classified as residential excess acreage for the 2009 tax year. The Court reverses in part and affirms in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
During the 2009 tax year, Kildsig owned 12.648 acres of land upon which his resi-denee, two pole barns, a lake, and just over 11 acres of woods was situated. The War-rick County Assessor assessed the property at $192,600…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1999
- Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks County AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2010
- Amax Inc. Ex Rel. Amax Coal Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1990
- Orange County Assessor v. StoutIndiana Tax Court · 2013
- Alte Salems Kirche, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DeKalb County Assessor v. Paul L. and Joan E. ChavezIndiana Tax Court · 2016
- Lee and Sally Peters v. Lisa Garoffolo, Boone County Assessor, and the Indiana Board of Tax ReviewIndiana Tax Court · 2015
- CVS Corporation (6698-02) v. Monroe County AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2017
- CVS Corporation v. Monroe County AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2017
- Larry G. Jones and Sharon F. Jones v. Jefferson County AssessorIndiana Tax Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.