Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 20, 2001No. 99-4282PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Michael Bailey, Robert Allen, and Charles Skotynsky, inmates at Lima Correctional Institution, appeal the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous their action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Supp. IV 1998) challenging an Ohio statute and rule that require a $3 copayment for medical services.1 The inmates assert a multitude of constitutional challenges to the statute and rule. We affirm.

The Ohio Legislature enacted a financial responsibility statute that allows the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to recover costs of supervision and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jones v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Sickles v. Campbell County, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Gallagher v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Bostic v. MehrDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  5. Brierley v. FriendDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API