David Proctor v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted on three counts of robbery and sentenced to imprisonment for from two to six years on each count, sentences to be served concurrently. On appeal we consider, first, whether testimony as to a statement Proctor made at the police station was admissible under Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and second whether an in-court identification was proper under Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct.1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967). We conclude that further facts are necessary before either point can be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HaasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Burley Clifton Harryman v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Willie E. Pendergrast v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Hines v. J. E. Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, NewyorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.