City of Hallandale v. Leisure Colony Management Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentAdkins, Judge
I dissent. By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal (City of Hallandale v. Leisure Colony Management Corp., 328 So.2d 851), which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of this Court (Coogler v. Rogers, 25 Fla. 853, 7 So. 391 [1889]) and other decisions on the same point of law. Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
The petitioner, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, enacted an ordinance in 1964 specifying the number of parking spaces required for each apartment. This ordinance was amended in 1966 and again in 1968. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- School District v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Coogler v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Paradise Pools v. GenauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- A1A Mobile Home Park, Inc. v. Brevard CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Camp v. MoseleySupreme Court of Florida · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.