Johnson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORFINGER, Judge.
Because the failure to give the instruction on penalties was properly preserved for appeal under Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), (rehearing denied), and Kelly v. State, 389 So.2d 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), we must reverse the conviction and order a new trial. However, because the evidence of appellant’s guilt is clear and the failure to give the instruction appears to be harmless, we certify to the Supreme Court of Florida the same question already certified in Gee v. State, No. 80-336 (Fla. 5th DCA February 11,1981), viz:
CAN AN APPELLATE COURT APPLY THE HARMLESS…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tascano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Studstill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Heggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Nelms v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981