Legal Opinion
Macrum v. Board of Supervisors
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
Plaintiffs are taxpayers. Defendants are members of the board of supervisors and the treasurer and superintendent of highways of the county of Suffolk.
Plaintiffs seek an injunction enjoining the issue of $5,000,000 in bonds and the expenditure of their avails and also pray for a declaratory judgment decreeing among other things that the ordinances creating the funded debt are invalid. The proof is largely documentary and nearly all the facts conceded.
The ordinances provide for public improvements throughout the county, more particularly (1) for the construction of county roads and two bridges…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Escanaba Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kittinger v. . Buffalo Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Commonwealth v. CoombsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
- Fort Plain Bridge Co. v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. IrwinNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1938
- People v. SitonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2010
- Twin City Service Station, Inc. v. City of North TonawandaNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- In re Rosom Utilities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.