Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Blum

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1919No. 3241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States Cor the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Edward E. Cushman, Judge. Action by Estelle M. Blum against the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This cause was tried jointly with United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blum, 258 Fed. 897, and by stipulation the facts of that case are to be considered herein. Inasmuch as the questions of law are also the same as in the other ease, upon the authority of the decision therein, the judgment is reversed, with directions to grant a new trial.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christensen v. New England Mutual LiFe InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944