Legal Opinion

Ferry v. County of King

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1891No. 98PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to District Court, King County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

*339The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J.

— This was an action by defendant in error, King county, against George X). Hill and his sureties upon his official bond as county treasurer of said county, to recover a specified sum of money alleged to have been received by said Hill, as such treasurer, for the use of said county during his official term of two years, commencing on the first Monday in January, 1881, but which he failed to account for to the proper authorities, or to pay over to his succéssor in office, as required by law. The cause was tried by a referee, who, having…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. People v. . GibbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Nolley v. Callaway County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  4. Waterman v. MattairSupreme Court of Florida · 1853
  5. Hunt v. State ex rel. EdgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Isham v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Dudley v. DuvalWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State Ex Rel. Northeast Transportation Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Minshull v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API