Legal Opinion

M.M. v. C.M.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1992No. 2900605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This is a child dependency case.

In 1990, the Shelby County Department of Human Resources (DHR) filed a petition to establish the dependency of C.A.M. A *317guardian ad litem represented the child at a detention hearing. The whereabouts of the presumed father were alleged to be unknown. At the hearing, the mother stated that C.M. was the legal, but not the natural, father of the child. After taking testimony ore tenus, the trial court found the child to be dependent, and custody was placed with DHR pending further proceedings.

After DHR conducted a home investigation and a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. STATE DEPT. OF PENSIONS AND SEC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Finkenbinder v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. D.D. v. C.L.D.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Evans v. EvansCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Witcher v. MotleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M.M.S. v. D.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. W.T.H. v. M.M.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. W.T. v. State Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. J.N.H. v. N.T.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. F.G.W. v. S.W.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API