Legal Opinion

Smith v. Norton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe county court of Eond du Lac county: A. E. Richtee, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

It appears from tbe record that May 4, 1900, tbe plaintiff commenced an action before a justice of tbe peace to-recover $35 as tbe reasonable value of legal and other services rendered by tbe plaintiff for tbe defendant at his instance and request during tbe months of August, September, and October, 1899. Tbe defendant, by way of answer, denied liability and pleaded payment. On the trial before tbe justice tbe testimony of tbe plaintiff tended to support bis claim, and was to tbe effect that bis services were-rendered in an effort to free tbe defendant’s lands of incum-brances ; that in doing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fintel v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Silvernail v. RustWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapleau v. Manhattan Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Luckow v. BoettgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. James v. WoerpelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API