Legal Opinion

Musquez v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Noonan.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

The indictment in this case alleges that “Amaranti Musquez, Marcial Tigirina, and Ignacio Waldonado did feloniously and unlawfully steal, take, and carry away from the possession of Manual Barragon six head of work oxen, of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars, the .property of said Manual Barragon, without the consent of said Manual Barragon, and with the fraudulent and felonious intent to deprive the said Manual Barragon of the value of said six head of work oxen, and to appropriate the same to the use and benefit of them, the said Aramanti Musquez, Marcial…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  3. Wampler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Pueblo v. LópezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API