Legal Opinion · Dissent

Welby Gardens v. Adams County Bd. of Equalization

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 23, 2003No. 02SC415Published

1DissentJustice Kourlis

In my view, the statutory language concerning the definition of agricultural land in sections 39-l-102(1.6)(a)(I) and (3.5), is ambiguous. Specifically, the statutory directive that horticultural products must “originate from the land’s productivity” in order to qualify the underlying land for agricultural tax status is unclear as written. The relevant legislative history provides no definitive guidance. In the face of such an intractable ambiguity, I suggest that the court must rule in favor of the taxpayer, thus giving the land under the greenhouses the agricultural land status.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Charnes v. BoomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API