Legal Opinion
Barber v. Hardwick
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1958No. 8843PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLADNEY, Judge.
This suit involves the ownership of a horse. Both parties litigant attempted to prove their respective claims by numerous *726witnesses, each one of whom had had some knowledge of the animal in question. Following a trial in which the testimony apparently was honest and sincere the trial judge ruled the plaintiff had not borne his burden of proof as to ownership of the horse and rejected his demands. The ruling likewise denied a reconventional demand asserted by the defendant. From this judgment plaintiff alone has appealed.
Although no question of jurisdiction has been raised by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brantley v. TugwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Nash v. CuretteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Jackson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- McNeill v. ElchingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Cappel Lumber Co. v. BenedictLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Newton v. Inter-American, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Twin City Printing Co. v. Fred Astaire Dance StudioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sales Financing Management, Inc. v. RichmondLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.