Legal Opinion
Connolly v. Suffolk County Sheriff's Department
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided September 30, 2004No. 02-P-1314PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.
Arthur Connolly, John Handren, and James Kane challenge (pursuant to G. L. c. 151B, § 6, and G. L. c. 30A, § 14) a judgment of the Superior Court that affirmed a decision of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD).3 The MCAD had found the Suffolk County sheriff’s department (department) liable for employment discrimination against the plaintiffs and awarded them partial relief, including damages for emotional distress.4 Dissatisfied with the extent of the relief granted, the plaintiffs contend that the MCAD failed to apply the correct legal standard in determining whether…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Blare v. Husky Injection Molding Systems Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- G.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Falmouth Marine, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Wheelock College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Mole v. University of MassachusettsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- DAMIAN ANKETELL & another v. OFFICE OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS REGULATION.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Sy v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- United Steelworkers of America v. Commonwealth Employment Relations BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Bahosh v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Boston Police Department v. JonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.