Legal Opinion

Lew Choy v. Jim Sing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1923No. 17842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The plaintiff sued upon an instrument written in the Chinese language, a literal translation of which is as follows: “1918 Naknek Cannery — I owe Charlie Sam $823.35; 1920 Newskate Cannery — I owe Charlie Sam $1,810.90, total amount $2,634.25. Signed May 10,1921, by Jim Sing, 200-3d Ave. South, Seattle, Wash.” The complaint alleged that the instrument had been duly assigned to her and that she was the owner thereof, and no part of the amount called for had been paid and all was past due. The answer admitted the correctness of the translation, but denied that the defendant had signed the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MezgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. Hurd v. Central Utah Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stinson v. StallsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API