Legal Opinion
Wendland v. ADOBEAIR, INC.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 8, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 07-0815PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant AdobeAir, Inc. appeals from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs Daniel and Catherine Wendland. AdobeAir argues that the trial court erred by allowing the Wend-lands to present evidence to the jury relating to Occupational Safety and Health Act 1 standards and by instructing the jury as to the applicability of such evidence. 2 For the following reasons, we affirm.
BACKGROUND 3
¶2 The Wendlands sued AdobeAir and other entities for negligence relating to Mr. Wendland’s unexpected fall into an open pit located in a facility controlled by AdobeAir (the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Charles A. Ries, III v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A/K/A Amtrak National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Ludis J. Cooper v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, and the Budd Company, Ludis J. Cooper v. The Firestone Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sumrall v. Mississippi Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Hansen v. KemmishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Barnes v. OutlawArizona Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Greg Shepherd v. Costco Wholesale CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Ledeaux v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
- Samuel Paz v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.