Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. Laile

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 11, 1981No. Civ. 2472-XPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

' HOLMES, Judge.

Laile sued Humphreys. The case was tried on the theory that Humphreys breached a contract with Laile. The trial court after an ore tenus hearing found for Laile and awarded damages in the amount of $2,384.45. Humphreys appeals and Laile cross-appeals. We affirm.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether there is evidence to support the trial court’s finding of a contract between Laile and Humphreys.

The dispositive issue on cross-appeal is whether there is evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Laile and Hum-phreys terminated the contract by mutual assent.

The record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. San-Ann Service Inc. v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Rush v. ATOMIC ELEC. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Biddy v. BiddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibson v. King (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API