Stix v. Matthews
Supreme Court of Missouri
JError to Jackson Special Law and Fquity Court. — r-HoN. R. E. Cowan, Judge. Even if the first four notes were non-negotiable under the laws of Indiana, the petition alleged and the evidence is. that the makers were non-residents of this State, and the defendants as assignees thereof, were liable. R. S. 1879,, § 665.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
This is a suit instituted by plaintiffs against defendants as indorsers on five notes as negotiable • paper. There are five counts in the petition. In the first count the note declared upon was payable at the “ Bank of Bedford, Lawrence county, Indiana;” in the second at the “ Bedford Bank, Lawrence county, Indiana;” in the third at the “ Bank in Bedford, Lawrence county, Indiana ;” in the fourth at the “ Bank in Bedford, Lawrence county, Indiana;” in the fifth the note was payable at the “Bank of Wheeling, West Virginia.”
This cause has heretofore been before this court, and is reported in 63…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stix v. MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- First National Bank v. GrindstaffIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Porter v. HollowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Ingwerson v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- McCormick v. Interstate Consolidated Rapid Transit Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Steinberg v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Herrick v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.