Legal Opinion

Downer v. Flint

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Trover for fifty sheep, originally commenced before a justice and brought into the county court by appeal. Plea, the general issue; trial by jury, May Term, 1855, — Underwood, J., presiding.

Read the full summary

Trover for fifty sheep, originally commenced before a justice and brought into the county court by appeal. Plea, the general issue; trial by jury, May Term, 1855, — Underwood, J., presiding. The plaintiff’s testimony tended to prove that the sheep in question belonged to and were bailed by him to one Sylvanus Chamberlin, as whose property they were attached, by the defendant Ellsworthj upon a writ in favor of the defendant Flint, and placed in Flint’s possession, from whom the plaintiff demanded them, and that Flint refused to let the plaintiff have them unless he would buy and pay for them;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redeield, Ch. J.

I. The decision in regard to costs seems to us correct. Each defendant, in actions of tort, has been treated as a distinct party in the suit, until by joining in a plea in bar, with others, or in some other way, he so identified his interests with others, that the success of the defense, as to each one, depended upon its success, as to all. This will entitle them to tax separate travel and' attendance, before the justice, and separate travel and term fees, in the county court., ' The attorney fee is given, on account of the trial, and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Twin Valley Motors, Inc. v. MoraleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API