Legal Opinion

Mulivrana v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1930No. 6054PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action on a policy of war risk insurance. From a judgment of non-suit, the plaintiff has appealed. . The appellant entered the military service of the United States in July, 1917; applied for and was granted war risk insurance, in the amount of $10,000, in October, 1917, and was discharged from the service in August, 1919. No premiums were paid after his discharge, so it is conceded that there can be no recovery under the policy unless the appellant became totally and permanently disabled, within the meaning of the law, prior to October 1, 1919.

An extended…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brandaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. SearlsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. De ArmondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Glazow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. AuerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API