United Access Technologies, LLC v. Centurytel Broadband Services LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by a patent owner requires us to address the collateral estoppel effects of a general jury verdict in a prior action involving the same patents’. The district court held that the jury’s verdict against the patentee in the prior action was entitled to collateral estoppel effect in this proceeding. We reverse.
I
Plaintiff-appellant United Access Technologies, LLC (“United”), is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,844,596; 6,243,446; and 6,542,585. The asserted claims of the three patents recite systems for using a landline telephone connection for both voice…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chew v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Travis Abbott v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial CorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- American Vanguard Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Bifolck v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.