Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1989No. A89A1128, A89A1515Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBanke, Presiding Judge

The state is authorized to appeal a criminal sentence only where it is absolutely void due to some legal prohibition. See State v. Stuckey, 145 Ga. App. 434 (243 SE2d 627) (1978). The test is not whether the sentence was technically correct but whether it “ ‘could legally have been imposed.’ ” State v. Wilkerson, 161 Ga. App. 185, 186 (288 SE2d 137) (1982). The sentence imposed on the appellant’s armed robbery convictions clearly was not less than that permitted by law. Consequently, the state’s appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. I concur, however, in the affirmance of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API