Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Zack

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

(after stating the facts). The parties are concerned chiefly with securing a judicial construction of the building restrictions imposed upon this subdivision. Defendant says he is not erecting any building on the northerly 25 feet of the lot, and, while admitting his intention to make an entrance to the garage from Burlingame, attempts to justify his action in so doing by the fact that 25. feet off the northerly side of such lot has been acquired by the city, and since 1919 has been used for street purposes; that there being no record restrictions against the remainder of the lot, it follows…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tabern v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holderness v. Central States Finance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ottawa Shores Home Owners Ass'n v. LechlakMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cooke v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API