Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred Cline and Wife, Luzene Cline

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1965No. 9724_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On remand, United States v. Cline, 307 F.2d 282 (4 Cir., 1962), the District Judge heard, and has appraised, the historical and expert evidence in exacting detail. He has found that “To the extent, if at all, that the Clines occupy property which would not be flooded by water at the elevation of 1837.41 they are trespassers upon the lands of the United States * * He gives with clarity the evidential support for his conclusions. The decision was purely a factual resolution of complex and conflicting proof and, certainly, it cannot be said to be “clearly erroneous”. We affirm on the basis of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ClineDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1964
  2. United States v. Fred Cline and Wife Luzene ClineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Fred Cline and Wife, Luzene ClineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API