Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Mayor

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtGbeenbaum, J.

The defendant Collins having a contract with the defendant The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty *132of the City of New York for the regulating and grading of Jerome avenue, in the said city, entered into an agreement with the plaintiff whereby the latter was to furnish certain material to be used upon this work. For the sum claimed to be due him under his contract with Collins, the plaintiff, on March 6, 1897, filed a mechanic’s lien under the provisions of the New York City Consolidation Act then in force (Laws of 1882, chap. 410, §§ 1824-1838), and this suit was brought to foreclose the lien so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morton v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Ringle v. MatthiessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Clarke v. HeylmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. McDonald v. Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sitts v. Waiontha Knitting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. McDonald v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API