Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 11, 2005No. SC 86050Published

1ConcurrenceRonnie L. White, Chief Justice

1 concur in the principal opinion. I write separately only to object to the obi-ter dicta suggestions offered to the legislature by our respected colleague, Judge Price, in his concurrence. There is no question that the courts are the final arbiters of the law and that the judiciary may not shirk their duty to interpret the law.1 Coupled with this noble pursuit, however, is the unqualified need and long-standing tradition of exercising judicial restraint and avoiding the political thicket to serve the public interest of “allowing the political process to function free from judicial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. O'BRIEN v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Mathewson v. Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Greenlee v. Dukes Plastering ServiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API