Legal Opinion

Brickell v. . Bass

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1794Published

1Opinion

It might have been proper, perhaps, in forming the first decisions upon this clause of the act, for the courts to have held it necessary to move for the affirmance of judgment at the first term of the Superior Court after the appeal prayed; but the uniform practice hath been to move for the affirmance at any term after (some adjudications in this circuit at New Bern cited to that effect); and, therefore, notwithstanding this latter objection, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed, with double costs. Affirmed accordingly.

NOTE. — As to what circumstances will be deemed sufficient to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. . MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822
  2. Hood v. . OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1817
  3. McMillan v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1815
  4. Dyer v. . RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1816

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API